Put it on the EBT (clarification)

On my last post, I wrote about people using their EBT cards (food stamps) for all kinds of junk food, from cookies to sodas, in a single transaction.

I must clarify something. I meant to say that there should be some way of preventing people, particularly the obese and diabetic, from having an entire TRANSACTION of junk food bought with government assistance (i.e.: five sodas, three bags of potato chips, two bags of cookies, etc.). A comfort food here and there is not a problem, in my opinion. If you want to buy a large amount of junk in one transaction, you should use your own money.

I am aware that, like anything, this can be abused. People could simply make several small transactions of junk food instead of one large one.

I am aware that this has the potential to become something of a “government-approved quotas of unhealthy vs. healthy food” program.

I am simply making the point that it doesn’t make sense to allow the dependent diabetic or obese person to perpetuate their worsening condition to the point of more medical expenses billed to the government.

Here’s a good idea: If you are diabetic or obese, don’t buy foods that will kill you faster than your condition. Make the right choice and use the assistance to better your life to the point where you no longer need the assistance.

Society wants to make sure you are taken care of. However, we don’t want you to go in a downward spiral that will cost the government even more. See a dietitian, look online, see a doctor or just use common sense to improve yourself.

 

Advertisements

Put it on the EBT

I have nothing against EBT cards (food stamps). I think it’s a great program that keeps many from going hungry.

Having said that, one thing I don’t get is why the government allows people to use their cards on “foods” like soda, potato chips, cookies, cakes, candy and even Starbucks (inside a Target store, for example).

When it comes to people’s food choices, I know that the government cannot force people to eat one thing or another. The freedom to rise and fall on one’s own merits is one of the many great freedoms in the United States (apparently, many Americans apply this rise-fall concept to their bathroom scales).

Let’s say someone who’s obese and diabetic…or on the verge of becoming diabetic…buys cookies, potato chips, cheesecake, and sodas all in one transaction with their EBT card. I have seen this countless times as a cashier at Target and it continues to baffle me.

Government programs like food stamps are designed to provide the poor and vulnerable with life’s necessities. Buying a venti extra-caramel Caramel Frappucino at the Starbucks inside a Target store is not a necessity (it’s just too much, really).

The unhealthy person who habitually buys junk food with his or her EBT card at the checkout counter will most likely have complications with diabetes and obesity. If they cannot afford food, they cannot afford healthcare and their medical expenses are billed to the government. This is easy to correct or at least curtail.

Currently, the word “investment” is used frequently. “Invest in education.” “Invest in healthcare.” “Invest in the future.” Why aren’t we forbidding the very unhealthy from essentially perpetuating the cycle of dependence? Why is the government helping the unhealthy become even more unhealthy?

The least we can do is exclude junk food and non-essentials from being covered by an EBT card. If one wants to buy a large cheesecake and a side of extra-cheddar chips at the grocery store, buy those items with one’s own money.